03. Ideology as Artificial Respiration: Hegel on Stoicism, Skepticism and Unhappy Consciousness

Arvi Särkelä

Abstract


This paper draws upon Hegel’s analysis of Stoicism, Skepticism and the Unhappy Consciousness as intellectual reactions to social pathology. He argues that, in Hegel’s view, the true and the false are held together in ideology by its being recognitively educational: ideology presents both a moment of social pathology and a moment of its overcoming. It gives, so to speak, artificial respiration for a social life fallen ill. The paper argues against two readings of these passages (as distinguished by Robert Stern). For the ‘historical materialist’ interpretation put forward by Alexandre Kojève, Stoicism, Skepticism and Unhappy Consciousness are treated as servile ‘ideologies’ and given a ‘purely socio-political rationale.’ The conceptual realist reading, by contrast, identifies a clear conceptual progress in these shapes as they bring self-consciousness forth from what initially appeared to be a dead-lock in the preceding relation of Lordship and Bondage. The paper argues that both readings are partly right and partly wrong: the conceptual realist gets it right that Stoicism, Skepticism and Unhappy Consciousness are indeed distinctively novel shapes of consciousness; the historical materialist correctly points out that Stoicism, Skepticism and Unhappy Consciousness are ideologies functionally sustaining the dead equilibrium of Lordship and Bondage. Both aspects can be reconciled by regarding ideology as productive and potentially educative. Ideology works not only to maintain the dead equilibrium of Lordship and Bondage, but also revives the organic means of overcoming it. Thereby this paper argues for the necessity of ideology-critique as a component of an inclusive diagnosis that understands social pathologies as systematic disturbances in the reproduction of characteristically social life.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorno, T.W. (1993) Hegel: Three Studies (trans. S. W. Nicholsen) Cambridge: MIT University Press

Adorno, T.W. (2003) ‘Beitrag zur Ideologienlehre,’ in T. W. Adorno Gesammelte Schriften vol. 8, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag

Bristow, W.F. (2007) Hegel and the Transformation of Philosophical Critique Oxford: Oxford University Press

Dove, K.R. (1970) ’Hegel’s Phenomenological Method’ The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 615-641

Harris, H.S. (1995) Hegel: Phenomenology and System Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company

Hegel, G.W.F. (1977 [1807]) The Phenomenology of Spirit (trans. A. V. Miller) Oxford: Oxford University Press

Honneth, A. (2007) ‘Pathologies of the Social: The Past and Present of Social Philosophy’ in A. Honneth Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory Cambridge: Polity Press

Honneth, A. (2014) ‘The Diseases of Society: Approaching a Nearly Impossible Concept’ (trans. A. Särkelä) Social Research vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 683-703

Horkheimer, M. (1987) ‘Hegel und das Problem der Metaphysik,’ in M. Horkheimer Gesammelte Schriften vol. 2, Frankfurt Am Main: Fischer Verlag

Jaeggi, R. (2009) ‘Was ist Ideologiekritik?’ in R. Jaeggi & T. Wesche (eds.) Was ist Kritik? Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag

Kojève, A. (1969) Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit (trans. J. H. Nichols, Jr.) Ithaca: Cornell University Press

Marcuse, H. (1955) Reason and Revolution: Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory London: Routledge

Mead, G.H. (1962) Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist Chicago: Chicago University Press

Neuhouser, F. (forthcoming) ‘Hegel on Social Ontology and the Possibility of Pathology’ in I. Testa, L. Ruggiu & L. Cortella (eds.) I that is We, We that is I: Perspectives on Contemporary Hegel Leiden: Brill

Stern, R. (2002) Hegel and the Phenomenology of Spirit London: Routledge

Stern, R. (2009) Hegelian Metaphysics Oxford: Oxford University Press




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20919/sspt.25.2015.26

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.