On the ontology of social pathologies

  • Onni Hirvonen University of Jyväskylä, Finland

Abstract

The recent years have seen a rehabilitation of the concept of social pathology in the critical social theory. However, several pertinent questions about how to understand social pathologies remain. One of the big issues is, who is actually ill when a society is ill? Is it certain individuals, a large proportion of the population, groups, institutions, or the society as a whole? And what does it mean for these entities to be in a pathological state?

This short presentation introduces four conceptions of social pathology that can be divided into roughly two camps. The “thin sense” of social pathology is more metaphorical and focuses on the socially caused and pervasive suffering of individuals while the “thick sense” of social pathology takes seriously the medical connotations of the word pathology and aims to apply them on the social or collective level. The aim in here is to highlight how the social-ontological commitments of the theories of social pathologies vary greatly. While it becomes clear that critical social theory can be achieved almost any combination of social ontological positions, the short analysis finishes with tentative desiderata for critical social ontology. 

Author Biography

Onni Hirvonen, University of Jyväskylä, Finland

Onni Hirvonen is a post-doctoral researcher in philosophy in the Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.

References

Canguilhem, G 1991. The Normal and the Pathological. New York: Zone Books.

Dewey, J 1973. Lectures in China, 1919-1920. (Trans and ed by Clopton, R and Tsuin-Chen, O.) Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.

Detel, W 2008. On the Concept of Basic Social Norms. Analyse & Kritik, 30, 469-482.

Honneth, A 2014. The Diseases of Society: Approaching a Nearly Impossible Concept. Social Research 81(3): 683–703.

Laitinen A, Särkelä A & Ikäheimo H 2015. Pathologies of Recognition: An Introduction. Studies in Social and Political Thought, 25, 3-24.

List C & Pettit P 2011. Group Agency. The Possibility, Design and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pettit, P 1996. The Common Mind. An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Pettit, P and Schweikard, D 2006. Joint Actions and Group Agents. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 36:1, 18-39.

Särkelä A 2017. Degeneration of Associated Life. Dewey’s Naturalism about Social Criticism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society. 53:1, 107-126.

Weinberger, O 1985. Freedom, Range for Action, and the Ontology of Norms. Synthese, 65, 307-324.

Zurn C 2011. Social Pathologies as Second-Order Disorders. In: Petherbridge D (ed) Axel Honneth: Critical Essays. Leiden: Brill, pp. 345-370.

Published
2019-02-21
How to Cite
HirvonenO. (2019). On the ontology of social pathologies. tudies in ocial and olitical hought, 28. https://doi.org/10.20919/sspt.28.2018.83
Section
Articles