04. Pathology of Love as Gender Domination: Recognition and Gender Identities in Axel Honneth and Jessica Benjamin
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20919/sspt.25.2015.28Abstract
This article aims at giving a critical account of gender domination by drawing on the concepts of recognition as presented in the work of Axel Honneth and Jessica Benjamin. I consider this form of domination as a pathology of love, which concerns especially the heterosexual sentimental bond. The argumentation proceeds in three steps: First, I reconstruct, in the wake of Honneth, the type of social normativity regulating relations of loving recognition, which I call normativity of interdependence. According to this, love partners are both dependent on the other and independent from them. Second, I argue by relying on Benjamin that the interdependence bond is to be understood as implying mutual exercises of power. I suggest power should be conceived of as a positive feature in the transformative process of recognition qua love. Third, I frame the pathology of loving recognition as a disruption of the interdependence relationship, due to the emergence of a sharp opposition between the identities of man and woman, namely, between an identity privileging independence and an identity privileging dependence as their peculiar constitutive features. Gender domination consists, then, in the unilateral exercise of power that blocks the transformative force of love.References
Benhabib, S. (1996) ‘On Hegel, Women and Irony’ in P. J. Mills (ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Hegel Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State UP
Benjamin, J. (1988) The Bonds of Love. Psychoanalysis, Feminism, and the Problem of Domination New York: Pantheon Books
Benjamin, J. (1995) Like Subjects, Love Objects. Essays on Recognition and Sexual Difference New Haven: Yale University Press
Benjamin, J. (2005) ‘What Mothers and Babies Need. The Maternal Third and its Presence in Clinical Work’ in S. F. Brown (ed.) What Do Mothers Want? Hillsdale: The Analytic Press, pp. 37-54
Finzi, S. V. (1996) Mothering: Towards a New Psychoanalytic Construction New York: Guilford Press
Gauthier, J. A. (1997) Hegel and Feminist Social Criticism Albany: SUNY Press
Honneth, A. (1995) The Struggle for Recognition. The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts Cambridge: Polity Press
Honneth, A. (2000) ‘Between Justice and Affection: The Family as Field of Moral Disputes’ in A. Honneth (2007) Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 144-162
Honneth, A. (2014) Freedom’s Right Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hutchings, K. (2003) Hegel and Feminist Philosophy Cambridge: Polity Press
Hutchings, K. & Pulkkinnen, T. (eds.) (2010) Hegel's Philosophy and Feminist Thought: Beyond Antigone? New York: Palgrave
Kittay, E. F. (1999) Love’s labor. Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency New York: Routledge
Kuch, H. (2013) Herr und Knecht. Anerkennung und symbolische Macht im Anschluss an Hegel Frankfurt a.M.: Campus
Okin, S. M. (1982) ‘Women and the Making of the Sentimental Family’ Philosophy and Public Affairs vol. 11, no. 1
Oliver, K. (2000) ‘Conflicted Love’ Hypatia vol. 15, no. 3
Ring, J. (1991) Modern Political Theory and Contemporary Feminism Albany: SUNY Press
Rössler, B. (2007) ‘Work, Recognition, Emancipation’ in B. van den Brink & D. Owen (eds.) Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 135-163
Rousseau, J.-J. (1979) Emile or On Education New York: Basic Books
Sayers, J. (1987) ‘Klein, Psychoanalysis, and Feminism’ Feminist Review no. 25, pp. 23-37
Stone, A. (2012) Feminism, Psychoanalysis and Maternal Subjectivity New York: Routledge
Young, I. M. (2007) ‘Recognition of Love’s Labor: Considering Axel Honneth’s Feminism’ in B. van den Brink & D. Owen (eds.) Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 189-212
Zurn, C. F. (1997) ‘The Normative Claims of Three Types of Feminist Struggles for Recognition’ Philosophy Today vol. 41, pp. 73-78
