The a-theoretical core of political realism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20919/sspt.28.2018.91Abstract
This paper aims to advocate a Williamsian approach to political realism and contends that contemporary realist political theory is built on an ‘a-theoretical core’ that the paper will call ‘political realism’ in the broader sense (for a very different approach to Williams, see Hall, 2013). The central tenet of this thesis is that contemporary realist political theory fundamentally differs from mainstream political theory not only in its political outlook, but also in its views about the tasks and prospects of theorizing. In other words, ‘political realism’ imposes severe constraints on theorizing in a realist key and makes contemporary realist political theory especially vulnerable to criticisms coming from mainstream political theory. This paper contends, however, that the inherent limitedness of contemporary realist political theory is a fair price that is worth paying for a more realistic understanding of politics.
The argument of the paper is built on the Williamsian assumption that mainstream political theory is ultimately a sort of ‘applied morality’ and that the fundamental problem with mainstream political theory as ‘applied morality’ is not so much its strong commitment to pre-political moral principles as its being fundamentally shaped by an ethical theory.
References
Cross, B. (2017): ‘Normativity in Chantal Mouffe's Political Theory’ Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory. Vol 24, Issue 2, pp.180–191
Dunn, J. (2000): The Cunning of Unreason. Making Sense of Politics. London: Basic Books.
Erman, E. & Möller, N. (2013): ‘Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World: The Priority of Morality and the Autonomy of the Political’. British Journal of Political Science
FirstView Article (June 2013): 1-19. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123413000148, URL: http://journals.
cambridge.org/abstract_S0007123413000148
Estlund, D. (2017): ‘Methodological moralism in political philosophy’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Vol 20, Issue 3, pp. 385-402
Galston, W. A. (2010): ‘Realism in political theory’. European Journal of Political Theory 9(4)
pp.385–411
Geuss, R. (2008): Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Hall, E. (2013): ‘The limits of Bernard William’s critique of political moralism’. Ethical Perspectives, 20 (2). pp. 217-243
Hall, E. & Sleat, M. (2017): ‘Ethics, morality and the case for realist political theory’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Vol 20, Issue 3, pp. 278-295
Leader-Maynard, J. & Worsnip, A. (2018): ‘Is There a Distinctively Political Normativity?’Ethics, 128 (4). pp. 756-787 https://doi.org/10.1086/697449
List, C. & Valentini, L. (2016): ‘The Methodology of Political Theory’. In: Cappelen, Herman - Gendler, Tamar Szabó - Hawthorne, John (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of
Philosophical Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 525-553
Machiavelli, N. (1998): The Prince. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Morgenthau, H. (1947): Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. London: Latimer House
Mouffe, C. (2013): Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso
Nardin, T. (2017): ‘The new realism and the old’. Critical Review of International Social and
Political Philosophy. Vol 20, Issue 3, pp. 314-330
Newey, G. (2001): After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy. Houndsmill: Palgrave McMillan
Philp, M. (2007): Political Conduct. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press
Sabl, A. (2002): Ruling passions: Political offices and democratic ethics. Princeton - Oxford:Princeton University Press
Sleat, M. (2013): Liberal Realism: A realist theory of liberal politics. Manchester - New York:
Manchester University Press
Thomas, A. (2015): ‘Rawls and political realism: Realistic utopianism or judgement in bad faith?’
European Journal of Political Theory. Vol 16, Issue 3, pp. 304 - 324
Thucydides (2009): The Peloponnesian War. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Valentini, L. (2012): ‘Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map’. Philosophy Compass 7 (9). pp.
–664, 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00500.x
Weber, M. (2004): The Vocation Lectures. Trans. by Rodney Livingstone. Indianopolis:
Hackett
Williams, B. (2005): In the Beginning was the Deed. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Williams, B. (2006): Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge
